Sunday, October 25, 2009

What Trucks Make The Best Prerunner?

What was behind the head who threw Izis this photograph? What had



E oes weariness, want to make a clean sweep at home, or by willingness to do not burdened with such a picture? Unclear how this reproduction of the impasse by photographer Trail Izis could fail in the middle of things incongruous among the Companions of Emmaus Angers. Izis? I must admit, that name reminded me nothing when I watched these children doing handstands. The black and white, street, children playing rather conjured Doisneau. But to read his biography I realize that I must not be alone in ignoring this talented photographer. Here is a brief summary.

Born in Marijampole in Lithuania in 1911, Izis, whose real name is Israels Bidermanas a French photographer. .

He emigrated to Paris in 1930, in order to escape anti-Semitic persecution and the desire to become a painter, then took refuge in the Limousin region during the war. He was arrested and tortured by the Nazis and then liberated by resistance. He then took up arms and photograph his companions from the bush.

After the war, returned to Paris, he befriended Jacques Prévert and artists of his era, painters or poets. He became a reporter for Paris Match, which published many of his photos including Grace Kelly, Roland Petit, Jean Cocteau, Colette, Gina Lollobrigida, Edith Piaf, Orson Welles but also those minors Montceau-les-Mines ... He has reported from Israel, England, Portugal and Algeria ...

He died in Paris in 1980.

In 1951, however Izis was among the "Five French photographers" who exhibited at MoMA in New York between Brassai, Henri Cartier-Bresson, Robert Doisneau and Willy Ronis. After a long journey through the desert his work comes first. In 2007, an exhibition Izis, through the photographic archives of Paris Match (1949-1969) "held at the Maison de la Photographie Robert Doisneau. Another exhibition, "Izis, photographer of the moment" was made in Limoges in 2007 and in Lithuania. An exhibition "Izis" is scheduled from January 17, 2010 at the Hotel de Ville in Paris. She will then travel to Berlin. The rediscovery of his work gives him the place today among the greatest.

Paris, Montmartre, 1949

be found in these images the sweetness of his careful eye and this distance in the world which is so special, between respect and emotion. Izis reporter remains the "peddler of images", wrote Prévert, both witness and poet.

Immigrants Banat (region of Hungary) of French origin back to France for reviving a village in ruins around noon deu 1949-1950. Izis / ParisMatch

Izis puts people at the center of his remarks. At the heart of the crowd, it captured the eyes and expressions, between respect and emotion, it is not looking for dramatic effects or stagings special.

Impasse Trail, paris, 1950



"It took me many years to dare to go near people with a device. But over time I managed to shoot without being seen. The people I photograph do not see me because they are mostly in their inner world, in their dreams. " Interview with IZIS published in Focus No. 51 - March 1978


Edith Piaf

One of the fundamental characteristics of his work is to bring out the wonder of everyday life, to dream. " The people I photograph are usually asleep or look away ... In my photos, even animals dream ... I picture myself ... In my childhood I was called a dreamer . .

London, White Chapel, 1950


" I press the trigger when I am in unison with what I see " Izis confide in his latest book Paris Poets published in 1977, a book which will be prefaced by Prévert shortly before his death.

Marseille, 1949

Paris, Jemmapes Wharf, Canal St Martin




Friday, October 23, 2009

Hairstylist Retirement Party Ideas

behind the head Yves Suty preparing the exhibition "Che Guevara: hero worship of the cult brand?" What had

Photography T. Bo nnet



E n requiring nearly seventy artists to work on the subject of Che Guevara, or more precisely its image as it has evolved over time, Yves Suty must have had some ulterior motive.
A tribute to Che?, Certainly not. A company bashing?, No more. To make a stunt denouncing the ideals of merchandise? Maybe. To gently mock the myth? If you want because there is indeed through the exhibits, with variations more or less respectful distance footprints and irony. That artists are reclaiming what has become a commodity?, No doubt. To discover the Che for the youngest and to show other facets of the revolutionary?, Since when the gallery are intended teaching now? On exhibit designers unaccustomed to exhibitions as from advertising or design, there's no doubt. " should know that I come from advertising and design activities that manufacture commercial myths. In this the myth of Che perfectly symbolizes the excesses of our system that churns everything it touches into ready-to-believe. Che reincarnated in brand, "says Yves Suty.
But to fully appreciate the works on display at the Grand Theatre d'Angers it may be necessary to make a little detour through history, to trace briefly the history of man and the image .


The revolutionary
Born June 14, 1928, in Rosario de la Fé, Argentina, the union of Celia de la Serna and a contractor Building, Ernesto Guevara Lynch, the future Comandante follows his family in the many journeys in connection with father's occupation. The condition of the family is far from being fragile, as evidenced by the decision to move to a resort in the region of Cordoba to treat asthma Che's small. After having completed his studies, Ernesto decides to go into medical school in Buenos Aires, where the family lives now, due to financial problems. It finances its own studies by working as a nurse, a shoe salesman. When he left his books and his asthma left him some respite he walks in the neighborhoods talking to vagrants and suffering.
passionate about travel, he left in late 1951, a motorcycle with his friend Alberto Granado, discover the Andes and the pre-Columbian cities. Came to the leper colony of Huambo, Peru, they offer themselves as volunteers. His journey takes him to Miami, where he remained for over a month with almost no money. His dislike for the USA is huge. Returned to Buenos Aires, he finished his doctorate of medicine then goes to Guatemala to join a revolution condemned by the U.S.. Refuge at the embassy in Argentina after the fall of the revolutionary government, Che, as they call it now takes the path of exile in Mexico. He will meet with Cuban revolutionaries Fidel Castro.

November 25 th 1956 , 82 revolutionaries including Commander Fidel Castro and Ernesto Che Guevara medical officer, away from the banks of the Rio Tuxpan to reach Cuban shores. After a journey that turns into a nightmare, the Cuban revolution can begin. The steps to follow endless heavy fighting with the regular troops to eventually reach the Sierra Maestra. Che was seriously wounded in the neck. But the revolutionary army saw its ranks swell and it is finally the night of December 31, 1958 January 1, 1959 that the city of Santa Clara is taken.
Batista fled and Che into Havana on January 2. The Comandante has become a living legend.
pages followed by a more controversial life of Ernesto as linked to his work within the prison Cabana where between 200 and 500 prisoners were killed. Joined

C Ubain he became the ambassador of the revolution and travels around the world. At 37, tired of political life, he resumed fighting and joined the revolutionaries fighting against Zaire Moise Tshombe. Its mission ended with the impeachment of President without his work there is to much.






















His revolutionary adventure ends in Bolivia, where its operation results in a failure. Abandoned and frustrated, he was captured by Bolivian soldiers, then executed October 9, 1967, then buried under a road. Thus ended the life of revolutionary. But the photographs of his death and the macabre staging wanted by the Bolivian military will tour the newsrooms. Some of these images can be compared to tables of Christ and will thus help to make the hero a martyr.



Che eternal

Who did ja but saw one of these photos? Whether in books, newspapers, posters, walls or on t-shirts, hard to escape! For most of us, she is the epitome of Che. The photograph was taken March 5, 1960 in Havana by Alberto Diaz Gutierrez Korda said at the funeral of 75 men killed in the explosion on the eve of the merchant ship French Minister of arms, The Coubre explosive is probably due to American intelligence. Rage, pain, feverish eyes, hair blowing in the wind mingle in this shot. Yet it will remain seven years in a drawer. It was the Italian Feltrinelli who digs in before the students rebelled not seize it into a symbol of protest. Within a few months, the photograph went around the world. She became in a short time the symbol of a myth posted on the bedroom walls of an entire generation. For the magazine photo, Jacques Seguela advertising mogul, describes the photograph: " Korda's photograph concentrates all the virtues attributed to Che: honesty, bravery, selflessness, challenge, loyalty, pride, not to mention a dose of military masculinity. The face of Che Guevara expresses both the strength (against USA) confidence (in the future of the revolution), neglect (beard, long hair in the wind) the seriousness of the commitment (the star Commander on his beret) . The Irish artist Jim Fitzpatrick's stylized using only black and white and will turn it into a representation of a pop icon propelling the same time Che among the rock stars.

A paradoxical fate



Che has been manipulated by the policy? The debate remains open, but what you may check more than 40 years after his death, the survival of the myth or less exploitative market the revolutionary icon. What about the flood of consumer goods bearing the likeness of Che? He who has fought all his life capitalism ultimately becomes the best expression of the spirit of consumerism, this economic and political system. Could he imagine that thousands of T-shirts bearing his face, that the turnover generated by this business which operates its image beyond the hundreds of millions of dollars? There are countless companies in the world that produce items specifically dedicated to Che, the majority are American or multinational North American capital. Members of the jet set as the footballer Maradona, the boxer Mike Tyson, the singer Manu Chao or the actor Johnny Depp tattoos exhibit dedicated to Comandante, causing a boomerang effect on the masses always inclined to take these celebrities as an example. Those who buy these items are available for a few Euros they myth they believe to be revolutionary, saviors of the world? I do not think. The phenomenon might be studied, it nevertheless retains its mystery. Christopher Hitchens, " iconic status of Che is that it has failed. His story is a h istory of th defeated and isolated. is a revolutionary who has neither claws nor fangs and it embodies a rebellion that offends no one. Had he lived older, would he have been associated with power, the myth of Che would have died long then ". Especially it is adorned with a pretty face, and if Ernesto Guevara had the crooked nose, eyes with strabismus and the nutcracker chin?

Artists and Che

Here one thinks of Andy Warhol. He uses the image of Che as those of Maylin Monroe, Jackie Kennedy, Mao, Elvis Presley. Neither honor nor criticism nor diversion, just a "serialization", to give a product known as the widely publicized. The man was removed in favor of the image, its ideals have vanished, giving way to the figure of the revolutionary hero reviewed by the New York artist.
Very few artists, however, as Argentina's Miguel Hunt wanted through their paintings pay tribute to Ernesto Guevara .

The exhibition presented by Yves Suty is not political, 40 years have passed since the death of guerrilla fighter. We are in France, the ideas of revolution have fizzled, and the dispute embodied in other poeple, the pretty boy, postman by trade, cantor of the NPA by its fonction.Il is here, each in its way to revisit the image of Ernesto Guevara.
It may be noted that especially the signs of virility military, challenge, courage, pride that attracted the young painters. Honesty, disinterestedness mentioned appear Seguela not. The isolation and defeat can be reflected in some tables. What catches the attention is the character Che, which is due without doubt one of the revolutionary pipolisation updated.


Dai Dai offers three times the life of Che: the doctor, the guerrilla and arrogant man sandwich he has become. To fully appreciate his works one should bear in mind the advertising campaigns for American dairy farmers "Got Milk" where the biggest American stars are asked to sing the praises of milk. The artist plays with the perspective of the viewer. It is no longer question lie below Ernesto Guevara, dominated by it in some way as in the photo but Korda over him as if he again became a mere human in turn dominated by the Most High. The wink that we address suggests that he is not fooled by what is happening or will succeed him.

Yves Ullens focuses, in turn, the journey of man with his ups and downs represented by the electro encephalogram. Found in the portrait of the important places where he lived with his eyebrows, depicted by the map of Cuba and the region of Buenos Aires nose, being a part of Bolivia. Barbed wire trap picture, it would be revolutionary prisoner of his image? The weapon and sthéthoscope that frame the EEG are of course the symbols of his action.










The universe of Terry and Dav Guedin are those of the comic book and action movies. Che is a hero but certainly just as Star Wars Chewbacka or Bruce Lee.














is with humor that Jo Draft launches its call for armed struggle, alluding to Gainsbourg and his Marseillaise (weapons and so on).

What we can notice is the unavoidable presence of signs that are attached to Che: the beret for its military role, the star for the revolution, the cigar to the fact that it has become Cuban. Cuba is omnipresent, phrases like Cuba free, Hasta la victoria semper also referring back to the speeches of Che. But these are the only references to his ideals and that sound more like advertising slogans. Besides, in general, artists are not exposed soft against the image of Comandante.



The reference to the icon Che is explicit in Doberman (icona popular) while Ian Stuyver us a course in applied semiotics. The stylized face of Che is an icon as well as the representation of the pedestrian, telephone, or by broken glass showing fragility. With a touch of humor the artist invents a container supposedly fragile, yet to be identified.



Some of the works on display depict the struggle between the revolutionary and U.S. imperialism and its economic counterpart, capitalism. Indeed
how to interpret the tin soldiers invading the surface of the painting, drawing and traits Guevara? But the sculpture of Michael Soubeyrand is not the defeat of Che against the Americans - or not only. " is also a representation of reality: Che gave an aesthetic image, seductive, attractive to the killing. His face is made of soldiers serving the revolution, his designs murderers. This piece sums up the exhibition" says Yves Suty.
Patrick Thomas is even more radical in my opinion. With American Investment, we mean that the revolution was defeated and that the signs of U.S. companies will catch up as they invade Cuba Che's face. The fight seems uneven as the Yankee army seems large and conquering. The victory of the American merchant is no doubt.

To go further:
File Ernesto Guevara in the journal History
An interview with Che in French: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5X0L_SPgoE
Travelogues (Diarios de motocicleta ) movie Brazil, Chile, U.S., Peru and Argentina in 2003 by Walter Salles
http://www.galeriesuty.com/

Saturday, October 10, 2009

Best And Worst Shower Hooks

behind Benoît Hamon head?



E mboîtant way to Marine Le Pen on the book by Frederic Mitterrand " The bad life," Benoit Hamon has surprised many by condemning the writings of a "minister-consumer" and judging "shocking" , "q u'u nh o m I can justify to the shelter of a literary narrative, sex tourism ", triggering a new storm in the ranks of the Socialist Party.
What is surprising indeed this is not gossip or rumors of such other customary among the extreme right but an echo among Leftists. Yet it is not about to comment on the excerpts in question nor the statements of each other but to think from this controversy over the report public / private through here the body of a politician. Some authors like Patrice Flichy reported this slow shift of public space to private space. Richard Sennett, meanwhile, in his book, "The tyrannies of intimacy", was the finding of the decline of group shows in favor of entertainment for private use and used the expression " privacy public. Here, what happens there ? The book, released almost five years ago , not provoked so little fuss and was greeted by some critics . But since the author became a minister and his body, so private, even if it was unveiled to the public through this story went public as political. In other words, the body of a policy is it private or public? Should we not distinguish what pertains to intimacy, the sex lives of politicians, which is private, posture body thereof.
It may be noted that there had recently jamming because the bodies of Nicolas Sarkozy and Barack Obama on the beach have toured the newsroom. By posture, I mean this body that the President of the French exhibits on the beach or further afield, that of Valery Giscard d'Estaing playing football. These images are similar to those of John Kennedy at the helm of his sailboat, the shirtless, displaying the strong body, synonymous with youth embodies a new policy, a guarantee of modernity.
Political life continues to customize, is a corruption so far and it is she a danger to democracy? The body becomes more important than the program? Or is it just a new staging of the body's physical power? Like the Roman emperors or kings of the French. What changes is that the flesh, absent, this becomes very close to the trivialization.
The individualization movement blurs the boundaries between public and private life, especially in the entertainment media and debate but also affects increasingly political communication that sees its players look the staging of the individual, personal speech, even the confession. Prior to the initial person in front of the political action was seen as a degradation or corruption of an authentic public sphere (Habermas). This is called drift populist demagoguery. It would then wonder as does Eric Maigret on possible forms of political personalization and interpret the phenomenon .
Finally, how in a society marked by public pressure (a host on the Internet according lyncheuse Finkielkraut) and the complexity of the issues for both elected responsible for solving problems and represent heterogeneous populations, this customization may appear to the public a means to judge their representatives?
To go further: visit my blog for students L1 educ
http://etaroncourssciencesinfocom.blogspot.com/

Friday, October 9, 2009

36weeks Pregnant Black Poop

Launch Blog


Finally, Blog has finally arrived!
Why behind the head? Because usually this is the place that our eyes can not reach. Here, the author of this blog is intended to show what you can not see or what you do not see.
The interest lies not in what will be shown, but in the demands of each other and their comments.
The action takes place in Angers, the student is ready with this test with no more surprised that my proposal: to show him what he has in mind.
Different series should follow as "But what they have behind the head, the young?"
"What they have behind the head men?"
Traders, girls, etc..
What will we see?
This blog is also intended for students Eric Taron to be redirected to other links, other blogs related to specific course or a specialized activity.